ca. 10 cm-1 in the two states, would be as shown in Fig. 1
(Transitions between levels indicated there will
be referred to later.). Each vibrational state has a set of rotational levels. These rotational levels are not
exactly the same since
varies slightly with v, the quantum number
labeling the vibrational state. (This latter effect is called vibration-rotation coupling)
Figure 1: Transitions between the lowest vibrational state, denoted v=0, and the next highrest vibrational state (v=1). Each vibrational state has many rotational levels denoted by a rotational quantum number (J' for the upper vibrational state, and J" for the lower). The spacing between rotational levels of the same vibrational state has been greatly exagerrated for clarity.
Equations (1) and (3) may be combined and if expressed as Term Values of a given state and level of the molecule as labelled by v and J, T(v,J) [in units of cm-1 then

However, these are only a first approximation to the true Term Values since there are small additional terms to be added to account for departures from our simplest models of vibration and rotation:
Here
exe is a small correction for
departure from harmonic
vibrational motion (i.e., a non-parabolic potential energy). This correction is
termed the anharmonicity of the bond. Anharmonicity must occur in all chemical bonds since at a
certain energy all chemical bonds break.
e is due to the interaction between rotation and vibration;
since R changes during the vibrational motion, so does I and therefore
.
Quantum mechanics also stipulates that only the certain transitions shown
in Fig. 1 are "allowed" via electric dipole radiation. The selection rules for this process
are such that both v and J change by 1 quantum in allowed transitions.
(
v=+/-1,
J=+/-1) Only molecules with permanent electric dipole moments
may exhibit infrared absorption,
v=+1,or emission,
v=-1.
J=0 is allowed only for electronic transitions in some diatomic molecules and non-linear
polyatomic molecules. Traditionally, the
J transitions are grouped together as branches
(see Fig. 1):
J = + 1, R branch
J = - 1, P branch
J = 0, Q branch (forbidden here)
To a first approximation the length of the arrows in Fig. 1
(proportional to the frequency
of the transition)
differ by 2
among the P branch transitions and among the R branch transitions,
but with 4
between the central P(1) and R(0) lines.
If the forbidden Q branch transition v=0, J"=0 to v=1, J'=0 (call it
o)
were included in the Figure then all spacings would be 2
.
If the very small term involving De is neglected in Eq. (4), the combined rotation-vibration
transitions in Fig. 1 can be written
For least squares fitting the P and R equations can be conveniently combined by letting m=(J"+1) in the R branch and (m = -J") in the P branch, yielding
(Note that there is no value corresponding to
o (m=0) for this molecule.)
For example, the transitions in Fig. 1 can be assigned values of m from -5 to +5 (with 0 missing) and a plot
of 
(m) versus m will yield
e
and
e. Then by use of Eq. (7) one can also find
o.
A typical spectrum is given in Fig. 2.
As illustrated in Fig. 2, all absorption lines are not expected to have the same intensity. The relative intensities are governed largely by the populations of molecules occupying the various rotational levels in the ground v=0 vibrational state (where the rotational levels are designated by J"):
where
"Rot=hc
eJ"(J"+1).
This is the Boltzmann distribution, where the factor 2J"+1 corresponds to the degeneracy gJ" of a given rotational level. One can see that there would be an exponential decrease in intensity with increasing J" except for the partially compensating factor of gJ" causing a maximum in the relative intensities.
Both the vibrational frequency
, (Eq. (2)), and the rotational constant
(through the moment of inertia, I) are affected by a change in the reduced mass
of the molecule. Changing the mass by the introduction of an isotope, such as D for H in HCl, will not change
the force constant k or the equilibrium bond distance Re since the character of the chemical bond
is unaffected. Then from Eq. (2).
Note that Eq. (9) is a first approximation, anharmonicity will change the calculated ratio slightly.
HCl (or DCl) prepared in the laboratory already contains two kinds of isotopomers, H35Cl
and H37Cl, since the natural abundance of isotopes of chlorine is 75.5% 35Cl
and 24.5% 37Cl, but the isotope shift between the chlorine isotopes is much smaller than that
induced by deuteration as can be seen by the much smaller reduced mass ratio of
(H37Cl) /
(H35Cl)
relative to
(D35Cl) /
(H35Cl) (which is
approximately 2).
Since the two dominant parameters,
and
, in Eq. (4) are different
for the different isotopes,
one can expect a different spectrum for each isotopomer. One can, in first approximation,
calculate the shifts involved from Eqs. (9) and (10). In the case of a mixture of H35Cl
and H37Cl (or D35Cl and D37Cl), the chlorine isotope effect is small
and the spectrometer used in the measurements may have insufficient resolution to detect the
small splittings ( <1cm-1) in the absorption lines in Fig. 2 due to this effect.
HTML by Lori Stoops
© 1996 // Innovative Teaching Labs // 3.10.1996